Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

archive/tar: round-trip of Header misses values #9027

Closed
gopherbot opened this issue Oct 30, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

archive/tar: round-trip of Header misses values #9027

gopherbot opened this issue Oct 30, 2014 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@gopherbot
Copy link

by vbatts:

What does 'go version' print?
go version devel +4d78f41ca8c9 Tue Oct 28 10:51:28 2014 -0700 linux/amd64
go version go1.3.3 linux/amd64

What steps reproduce the problem?

http://play.golang.org/p/pbzuxm1ft-

What happened?
Typeflag change from hardlink to softlink, and many fields were missed.

What should have happened instead?
Fields should be preserved and correct where possible.

Please provide any additional information below.
@ianlancetaylor
Copy link
Contributor

Comment 1:

Labels changed: added repo-main, release-none.

@bradfitz bradfitz removed the new label Dec 18, 2014
vbatts added a commit to vbatts/go that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2015
The issue was identified while
working with round trip FileInfo of the headers of hardlinks. Also,
additional test cases for hard link handling.
(review carried over from http://golang.org/cl/165860043)

Fixes golang#9027

Change-Id: I9e3a724c8de72eb1b0fbe0751a7b488894911b76
@rsc rsc added this to the Unplanned milestone Apr 10, 2015
@gopherbot
Copy link
Author

CL https://golang.org/cl/6790 mentions this issue.

@rsc rsc closed this as completed in f271f92 Jun 26, 2015
@mikioh mikioh modified the milestones: Go1.5, Unplanned Jun 27, 2015
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 27, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants