We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Observed in https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/golang/builders/ci/x_tools-gotip-darwin-amd64-longtest/b8726292744544624369/overview:
func IsTypeNamed(t types.Type, pkgPath string, names ...string) bool { if named, ok := types.Unalias(t).(*types.Named); ok { tname := named.Obj() <--- SIGSEGV return tname != nil && isPackageLevel(tname) && tname.Pkg().Path() == pkgPath && slices.Contains(names, tname.Name()) } return false }
Looks like a nil *types.Named found its way into a types.Object.
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x20 pc=0xe923009] goroutine 86548 [running]: golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.(*action).exec.func7.1() /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/gopls/internal/cache/analysis.go:1196 +0x233 panic({0xf4470e0?, 0xfd673c0?}) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/goroot/src/runtime/panic.go:787 +0x132 go/types.(*Named).Obj(...) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/goroot/src/go/types/named.go:308 golang.org/x/tools/internal/analysisinternal.IsTypeNamed({0xf5b9980?, 0x0?}, {0xf01bba6, 0x4}, {0xc036fcc998, 0x1, 0xe8b72e8?}) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/internal/analysisinternal/analysis.go:305 +0x89 golang.org/x/tools/internal/analysisinternal.IsMethodNamed({0xf5ccff8?, 0xc03cdf9200?}, {0xf01bba6, 0x4}, {0xf01c79a, 0x4}, {0xc036fccb00, 0x1, 0xc006f98808?}) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/internal/analysisinternal/analysis.go:339 +0xf8 golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis/passes/timeformat.run.func1({0xf5b9020?, 0xc0296d8140}) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/go/analysis/passes/timeformat/timeformat.go:53 +0xae golang.org/x/tools/go/ast/inspector.(*Inspector).Preorder(0xc03b883950, {0xc036fccb90?, 0x13ae9eb8?, 0x13ae9eb806f98808?}, 0xc036fccba0) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/go/ast/inspector/inspector.go:96 +0x8f golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis/passes/timeformat.run(0xc00ffafc00) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/go/analysis/passes/timeformat/timeformat.go:50 +0x8b golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.(*action).exec.func7(0xfd86400, 0xc036fccd48, 0xc00ffafc00, 0xc036fccd10) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/gopls/internal/cache/analysis.go:1209 +0x97 golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.(*action).exec(0xc03d2087e0, {0xf5be7c0, 0xc0347fca50}) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/gopls/internal/cache/analysis.go:1210 +0xb1c golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.execActions.func1.1() /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/gopls/internal/cache/analysis.go:909 +0x52 sync.(*Once).doSlow(0x0?, 0xc036fccf98?) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/goroot/src/sync/once.go:78 +0xab sync.(*Once).Do(...) /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/goroot/src/sync/once.go:69 golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.execActions.func1() /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/gopls/internal/cache/analysis.go:907 +0x85 created by golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.execActions in goroutine 86469 /Users/swarming/.swarming/w/ir/x/w/targetrepo564898521/gopls/internal/cache/analysis.go:905 +0x55 FAIL golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/test/integration/workspace 187.033s
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Already fixed by @timothy-king in CL 641177.
Sorry, something went wrong.
adonovan
No branches or pull requests
Observed in https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/golang/builders/ci/x_tools-gotip-darwin-amd64-longtest/b8726292744544624369/overview:
Looks like a nil *types.Named found its way into a types.Object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: