Skip to content

x/pkgsite: EUPL 1.1 not listed in license policy #71332

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
willfaught opened this issue Jan 19, 2025 · 5 comments
Closed

x/pkgsite: EUPL 1.1 not listed in license policy #71332

willfaught opened this issue Jan 19, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Documentation Issues describing a change to documentation. NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. pkgsite/license Issues related to licenses on pkg.go.dev. See our license policy https://pkg.go.dev/license-policy pkgsite
Milestone

Comments

@willfaught
Copy link
Contributor

willfaught commented Jan 19, 2025

What is the URL of the page with the issue?

https://pkg.go.dev/license-policy

What is your user agent?

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.2 Safari/605.1.15

Screenshot

Image

What did you do?

Read it.

What did you expect to see?

EUPL-1.1 listed, because according to https://spdx.org/licenses/ and https://opensource.org/licenses?ls=eupl, it is OSI-approved. It can also be detected by https://github.com/google/licensecheck.

What did you see instead?

EUPL-1.1 not listed.

@gopherbot gopherbot added this to the Unreleased milestone Jan 19, 2025
@seankhliao seankhliao added the pkgsite/license Issues related to licenses on pkg.go.dev. See our license policy https://pkg.go.dev/license-policy label Jan 19, 2025
@seankhliao
Copy link
Member

is anything actually using it? it's listed as superseded by EUPL-1.2 which is included

@gabyhelp
Copy link

@gabyhelp gabyhelp added the Documentation Issues describing a change to documentation. label Jan 19, 2025
@willfaught
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't have a specific package in mind. It just seemed to be an oversight.

@adonovan adonovan added the NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. label Jan 24, 2025
@adonovan
Copy link
Member

We agree; we should add EUPL-1.1 to the list.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/644735 mentions this issue: internal/licenses: add EUPL-1.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Issues describing a change to documentation. NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. pkgsite/license Issues related to licenses on pkg.go.dev. See our license policy https://pkg.go.dev/license-policy pkgsite
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants