Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strings, bytes, strconv, runtime: use SSE4.2 string instructions on amd64 #6749

Closed
gopherbot opened this issue Nov 11, 2013 · 7 comments
Closed

Comments

@gopherbot
Copy link

by rayneolivetti:

Chapter 10 of Intel Architectures Optimization Reference Manual describes use cases of
several SSE4 instructions that can speed up various routines in strings, bytes, strconv
and runtime packages.

The instructions are missing from 6l/6a by the way.
@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Nov 27, 2013

Comment 1:

Labels changed: added go1.3maybe.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Dec 4, 2013

Comment 2:

Labels changed: added release-none, removed go1.3maybe.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Dec 4, 2013

Comment 3:

Labels changed: added repo-main.

@bradfitz bradfitz removed the new label Dec 18, 2014
@rsc rsc added this to the Unplanned milestone Apr 10, 2015
@agnivade
Copy link
Contributor

@rsc - Is this still valid ? We already have SSE and AVX2 supported instructions in asm_amd64.s.

@agnivade
Copy link
Contributor

ping @martisch / @quasilyte - Does this still need to remain open ?

@randall77
Copy link
Contributor

@TocarIP

@TocarIP
Copy link
Contributor

TocarIP commented Sep 24, 2018

We are using sse4.2 for Index. I think this should be closed, and if there are some other places where sse4.2 makes sense, we should open specific bug for each potential function from runtime/strconv.

@dmitshur dmitshur changed the title strings, bytes, strconv, runtime: use SSE4.2 string instructions on am64 strings, bytes, strconv, runtime: use SSE4.2 string instructions on amd64 Sep 14, 2019
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants