-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
cmd/compile: SIGBUS unaligned access on mips64 via qemu-mips64 [1.21 backport] #67164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
This is a bug that miscompiles some type equality functions on architectures that can't do unaligned loads. There is no easy workaround. |
Change https://go.dev/cl/583303 mentions this issue: |
… equality functions ... if the architecture can't do unaligned loads. We already handle this in a few places, but this particular place was added in CL 399542 and missed this additional restriction. Fixes #67164 Change-Id: I45988f11ff3ed45df1c4da3f0931ab1fdb22dbfe Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/583175 Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: Derek Parker <parkerderek86@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 3c72dd5) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/583303
Closed by merging 58e77ad to release-branch.go1.21. |
CL |
Change https://go.dev/cl/583799 mentions this issue: |
… equality functions ... if the architecture can't do unaligned loads. We already handle this in a few places, but this particular place was added in CL 399542 and missed this additional restriction. Fixes #67164 (Reroll of CL 583303) Change-Id: Id067cc2e39d7d199672f2017f7f53991fb23f8d4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/583799 LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
CL submitted. |
@randall77 requested issue #67160 to be considered for backport to the next 1.21 minor release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: