Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runtime/pprof: block profile test is flaky on builders #6114

Closed
dvyukov opened this issue Aug 12, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

runtime/pprof: block profile test is flaky on builders #6114

dvyukov opened this issue Aug 12, 2013 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@dvyukov
Copy link
Member

dvyukov commented Aug 12, 2013

Currently observed only on linux/arm and netbsd/arm:
http://build.golang.org/log/85e18a65c0f1489a9fa56a4a62c5c4f686cf7852
http://build.golang.org/log/57eb8c7e2d3a85925b2691b4d5c648c1eae9266b
http://build.golang.org/log/74e4aabf174b4c5ac5fac6150f58ef567c9f7845

The profiles are completely empty:

    pprof_test.go:174: Bad chan entry, expect:
        [0-9]+ [0-9]+ @ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+
        #   0x[0-9,a-f]+    runtime/pprof_test\.produceChanContention\+0x[0-9,a-f]+ .*/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:[0-9]+
        #   0x[0-9,a-f]+    runtime/pprof_test\.TestBlockProfile\+0x[0-9,a-f]+  .*/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:[0-9]+
        
        got:
        --- contention:
        cycles/second=999990014
FAIL
FAIL    runtime/pprof   10.826s
@dvyukov
Copy link
Member Author

dvyukov commented Aug 13, 2013

Comment 1:

Issue #6118 has been merged into this issue.

@dvyukov
Copy link
Member Author

dvyukov commented Aug 14, 2013

Comment 2:

Issue #6145 has been merged into this issue.

@dvyukov
Copy link
Member Author

dvyukov commented Aug 14, 2013

Comment 3:

This issue was closed by revision 3bd0b0a.

Status changed to Fixed.

@rsc rsc added this to the Go1.2 milestone Apr 14, 2015
@rsc rsc removed the go1.2maybe label Apr 14, 2015
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants