Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cmd/compile: Value live at entry #54911

Closed
DrJosh9000 opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 12 comments
Closed

cmd/compile: Value live at entry #54911

DrJosh9000 opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 12 comments
Labels
compiler/runtime Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime. FrozenDueToAge NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done.
Milestone
Go1.20

Comments

@DrJosh9000
Copy link
Contributor

What version of Go are you using (go version)?

$ go version
go version go1.19.1 darwin/amd64

Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?

Yes.

What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env)?

go env Output
$ go env
GO111MODULE=""
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOCACHE="/Users/josh/Library/Caches/go-build"
GOENV="/Users/josh/Library/Application Support/go/env"
GOEXE=""
GOEXPERIMENT=""
GOFLAGS=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="darwin"
GOINSECURE=""
GOMODCACHE="/Users/josh/go/pkg/mod"
GONOPROXY=""
GONOSUMDB=""
GOOS="darwin"
GOPATH="/Users/josh/go"
GOPRIVATE=""
GOPROXY="https://proxy.golang.org,direct"
GOROOT="/usr/local/go"
GOSUMDB="sum.golang.org"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/usr/local/go/pkg/tool/darwin_amd64"
GOVCS=""
GOVERSION="go1.19.1"
GCCGO="gccgo"
GOAMD64="v1"
AR="ar"
CC="clang"
CXX="clang++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
GOMOD="/Users/josh/Code/adventofcode/go.mod"
GOWORK="/Users/josh/Code/adventofcode/go.work"
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_CPPFLAGS=""
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -arch x86_64 -m64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/var/folders/nd/p9vyzdbj1r1_1_wpyd3k_lvr0000gn/T/go-build4128977174=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common"

What did you do?

https://go.dev/play/p/LgwHMT5v_EV

What did you expect to see?

Compile without error.

What did you see instead?

./prog.go:12:19: internal compiler error: 'Set[go.shape.int_0].Copy': Value live at entry. It shouldn't be. func Set[go.shape.int_0].Copy, node .dict0, value nil

Please file a bug report including a short program that triggers the error.
https://go.dev/issue/new

Go build failed.
@gopherbot gopherbot added the compiler/runtime Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime. label Sep 7, 2022
@cuonglm

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@cuonglm cuonglm closed this as completed Sep 7, 2022
@DrJosh9000
Copy link
Contributor Author

The backport on that issue has milestone 1.19.1, which is the version I'm on, so either the backport is incomplete or this is a separate bug.

@cuonglm

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@cuonglm
Copy link
Member

cuonglm commented Sep 7, 2022

The backport on that issue has milestone 1.19.1, which is the version I'm on, so either the backport is incomplete or this is a separate bug.

go1.19.1 is a security release, so it's likely not include the backport.

cc @golang/release

Hmm, wait, I see the fix in go1.19.1: https://github.com/golang/go/commits/go1.19.1

Seems strange, on tip, it compiles ok in non-unified IR

go tool compile -d=unified=0 -p=main main.go

@cuonglm cuonglm reopened this Sep 7, 2022
@cuonglm
Copy link
Member

cuonglm commented Sep 7, 2022

So #53702 is the issue with non-generic, this is about generic.

Surprisingly, https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422196 fixes it.

Should we backport that fix? cc @mdempsky @randall77

@mdempsky
Copy link
Member

mdempsky commented Sep 7, 2022

Yeah, I think CL 422196 is safe to backport if it fixes a regression in 1.19.

@gopherbot
Copy link

Change https://go.dev/cl/428758 mentions this issue: test: add regression test for issue 54911

@cuonglm
Copy link
Member

cuonglm commented Sep 7, 2022

@gopherbot please backport this to go1.19

@gopherbot gopherbot mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2022
Closed
@gopherbot
Copy link

Backport issue(s) opened: #54917 (for 1.19).

Remember to create the cherry-pick CL(s) as soon as the patch is submitted to master, according to https://go.dev/wiki/MinorReleases.

@cuonglm
Copy link
Member

cuonglm commented Sep 7, 2022

@gopherbot please backport this to go1.18

@cuonglm cuonglm mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2022
Closed
@cuonglm
Copy link
Member

cuonglm commented Sep 7, 2022

Yeah, I think CL 422196 is safe to backport if it fixes a regression in 1.19.

Ack.

You're the owner of that CL, so please backport it when you have time 👍

@dmitshur dmitshur added this to the Go1.20 milestone Sep 7, 2022
@dmitshur dmitshur added the NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. label Sep 7, 2022
@mdempsky
Copy link
Member

mdempsky commented Sep 7, 2022 •
edited

So this issue affects both Go 1.18 and 1.19, including all of their point releases. So this isn't a regression per se; it's functionality that's never worked.

However, the underlying issue isn't generics specific. It was a latent issue in packages ir and inline, and merely exposed when the generics frontend started using ir.InitExpr to add init statements to OCLOSURE nodes to support certain generic expressions.

Theoretically, the issue here could lead to silent miscompilation of non-generics code. But looking at how we use ir.InitExpr in Go 1.18 and 1.19, it doesn't look like that can actually happen. I believe the only way the failure can manifest is as ICEs affecting generics code like reported in this issue.

Finally, the "no backports to Go 1.18 generics" policy is really about noder/stencil.go. That file is not really well understood by current team members, and attempts to fix issues in it have repeatedly introduced new issues. Those concerns don't apply here.

I'm weakly leaning towards backporting to both Go 1.18 and 1.19. I think the fix is safe and has real benefit to users; but I also don't think that's essential if we want to be conservative.

@mdempsky mdempsky mentioned this issue Nov 8, 2022
Closed
@cuonglm cuonglm mentioned this issue Jan 9, 2023
Closed
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
compiler/runtime Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime. FrozenDueToAge NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Go1.20
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@mdempsky @dmitshur @DrJosh9000 @cuonglm @gopherbot