-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
go/parser: stack exhaustion in all Parse* functions (CVE-2022-1962) [1.17 backport] #53707
Labels
CherryPickApproved
Used during the release process for point releases
FrozenDueToAge
release-blocker
Security
Milestone
Comments
Change https://go.dev/cl/417070 mentions this issue: |
Closed by merging ba8788e to release-branch.go1.17. |
gopherbot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2022
Limit nested parsing to 100,000, which prevents stack exhaustion when parsing deeply nested statements, types, and expressions. Also limit the scope depth to 1,000 during object resolution. Thanks to Juho Nurminen of Mattermost for reporting this issue. Fixes #53707 Updates #53616 Fixes CVE-2022-1962 Change-Id: I4d7b86c1d75d0bf3c7af1fdea91582aa74272c64 Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1491025 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 6a856f08d58e4b6705c0c337d461c540c1235c83) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/417070 Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
danbudris
pushed a commit
to danbudris/go
that referenced
this issue
Sep 9, 2022
EKS: - removed resolver file introducted in 1.17 - retained 1.16 method signatures for parser methods - removed reference to SkipObjectResoltion in parser depth test, as it was introduced in 1.17+ Limit nested parsing to 100,000, which prevents stack exhaustion when parsing deeply nested statements, types, and expressions. Also limit the scope depth to 1,000 during object resolution. Thanks to Juho Nurminen of Mattermost for reporting this issue. Fixes golang#53707 Updates golang#53616 Fixes CVE-2022-1962 Change-Id: I4d7b86c1d75d0bf3c7af1fdea91582aa74272c64 Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1491025 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 6a856f08d58e4b6705c0c337d461c540c1235c83) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/417070 Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
danbudris
pushed a commit
to danbudris/go
that referenced
this issue
Sep 9, 2022
EKS: - removed resolver file introducted in 1.17 - retained 1.16 method signatures for parser methods - removed reference to SkipObjectResoltion in parser depth test, as it was introduced in 1.17+ Limit nested parsing to 100,000, which prevents stack exhaustion when parsing deeply nested statements, types, and expressions. Also limit the scope depth to 1,000 during object resolution. Thanks to Juho Nurminen of Mattermost for reporting this issue. Fixes golang#53707 Updates golang#53616 Fixes CVE-2022-1962 Change-Id: I4d7b86c1d75d0bf3c7af1fdea91582aa74272c64 Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1491025 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 6a856f08d58e4b6705c0c337d461c540c1235c83) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/417070 Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
CherryPickApproved
Used during the release process for point releases
FrozenDueToAge
release-blocker
Security
@tatianab requested issue #53616 to be considered for backport to the next 1.17 minor release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: