-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bufio: no way to give/take underlying buffers #5100
Labels
Milestone
Comments
This issue was updated by revision 393b3b1. R=golang-dev, gri CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/8038047 |
One idea that would help a lot with rapid creation of bufio.NewReader, without changing any API: bufio: make Reader backing buffers transient https://golang.org/cl/8819049 Share garbage between different bufio Readers. When a Reader has zero buffered data, put its buffer into a pool. |
This issue was updated by revision b25a53a. R=r CC=adg, dvyukov, gobot, golang-dev, rogpeppe https://golang.org/cl/8819049 |
Owner changed to @bradfitz. |
This issue was updated by revision 3e38b7f. Update issue #6086 Remove switchReader, switchWriter, switchReaderPair, switchWriterPair, etc. Now it only maintains pools of bufio Readers and Writers, but uses Reset instead of working around all their previously-associated state. Compared to before the bufio Reset change, it's the same number of allocations, and also faster: benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkClientServer 111218 109828 -1.25% BenchmarkClientServerParallel4 70580 70013 -0.80% BenchmarkClientServerParallel64 72636 68919 -5.12% BenchmarkServer 139858 137068 -1.99% BenchmarkServerFakeConnNoKeepAlive 14619 14314 -2.09% BenchmarkServerFakeConnWithKeepAlive 12390 11361 -8.31% BenchmarkServerFakeConnWithKeepAliveLite 7630 7306 -4.25% BenchmarkServerHandlerTypeLen 9688 9342 -3.57% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoLen 8700 8470 -2.64% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoType 9255 8949 -3.31% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoHeader 7058 6806 -3.57% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkClientServer 61 61 0.00% BenchmarkClientServerParallel4 61 61 0.00% BenchmarkClientServerParallel64 61 61 0.00% BenchmarkServer 16 16 0.00% BenchmarkServerFakeConnNoKeepAlive 24 24 0.00% BenchmarkServerFakeConnWithKeepAlive 19 19 0.00% BenchmarkServerFakeConnWithKeepAliveLite 9 9 0.00% BenchmarkServerHandlerTypeLen 17 17 0.00% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoLen 14 14 0.00% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoType 15 15 0.00% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoHeader 9 9 0.00% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkClientServer 6988 6985 -0.04% BenchmarkClientServerParallel4 6979 6985 0.09% BenchmarkClientServerParallel64 7002 7019 0.24% BenchmarkServer 1846 1848 0.11% BenchmarkServerFakeConnNoKeepAlive 2420 2412 -0.33% BenchmarkServerFakeConnWithKeepAlive 2126 2129 0.14% BenchmarkServerFakeConnWithKeepAliveLite 989 990 0.10% BenchmarkServerHandlerTypeLen 1818 1819 0.06% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoLen 1775 1777 0.11% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoType 1783 1785 0.11% BenchmarkServerHandlerNoHeader 989 990 0.10% R=golang-dev, r CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/12708046 |
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: