I don't know why this test is failing, but I suspect that there are few if any gopls users on Plan 9, so I intend to add a test skip without investigating further.

I don't know why this test is failing, but I suspect that there are few if any gopls users on Plan 9, so I intend to add a test skip without investigating further.

Sounds reasonable. Thanks.

Change https://golang.org/cl/375876 mentions this issue: x/tools/gopls/internal/regtest/modfile: skip TestUnknownRevision on plan9

Change https://golang.org/cl/375877 mentions this issue: internal/lsp/tests: remove unnecessary uses of t.Helper

suspect that there are few if any gopls users on Plan 9

Not wanting to add on to the pile of "someone else may do it" in plan9. So I did find that fhs has created acme-lsp but doubt anyone on 9front or 9legacy is going to support it as an official feature at this time. While I can see it being added to p9p. I do not see the value add here to take the attention away from fixing the builder on arm64 plan9/9front.