You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The reaction is for the most part overwhelmingly positive. But dropping the import restriction has generated some important discussion, while dropping the type spelling restriction seems completely uncontroversial.
I've forked this issue off of #43217 to track only dropping the type spelling restriction. Then #43217 can be only about dropping the import restriction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
//go:embed variables can be type aliases.
//go:embed variables can't be local to a function.
For #43216
For #43602Fixes#43978
Change-Id: Ib1d104dfa32b97c91d8bfc5ed5d461ca14da188f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/288072
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
In #43217 (comment) I suggested two changes:
The reaction is for the most part overwhelmingly positive. But dropping the import restriction has generated some important discussion, while dropping the type spelling restriction seems completely uncontroversial.
I've forked this issue off of #43217 to track only dropping the type spelling restriction. Then #43217 can be only about dropping the import restriction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: