-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
plugin: program on linux/s390x sometimes hangs after calling "plugin.Open" [1.15 backport] #40693
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Change https://golang.org/cl/248478 mentions this issue: |
Approving per discussion in a release meeting. This backport applies to both 1.15 (this issue) and 1.14 (#40694). |
@dmitshur Why was this bumped to 1.15.3? This bug is causing a real problem for a user and the fix has been ready to go for quite some time. I'd have appreciated some sort of warning if there was a reason it was going to miss the cutoff. |
I generally don't use release blocker tags because we aren't supposed to for the non-first class ports. Should I start doing that if I feel an issue needs to be resolved? Alternatively bumping issue milestones a week or so earlier would give me time to start a discussion if I feel it shouldn't be bumped. EDIT: I've created a golang-dev post for discussion: https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/6b-rdo-i8sA |
I've answered more generally on the thread. The two backport CLs need to be reviewed, as they can't be submitted without a +2. Could you please find a code reviewer for them? Thank you. |
For what it's worth, I disagree with this - if an external contributor is going through the extra trouble of sending fixes and backporting them for a bugfix release, we shouldn't rely on them to stay on top of the CL for multiple days or even weeks until it finally gets a review. I personally think that, since we have https://dev.golang.org/owners and the release team already goes over all backport issues during the release process, it wouldn't be a lot of added work to simply ping the owners for a review of each backport CL well before the release is due. I imagine that should be enough for the vast majority of cases - if someone is listed as a package owner, I would argue that their top priority is reviewing and shipping critical bug fixes. |
Closed by merging bbee523 to release-branch.go1.15. |
…s390x The optimization that replaces inline markers with pre-existing instructions assumes that 'Prog' values produced by the compiler are still reachable after the assembler has run. This was not true on s390x where the assembler was removing NOP instructions from the linked list of 'Prog' values. This led to broken inlining data which in turn caused an infinite loop in the runtime traceback code. Fix this by stopping the s390x assembler backend removing NOP values. It does not make any difference to the output of the assembler because NOP instructions are 0 bytes long anyway. Note: compiler check omitted from backport to reduce risk of change. Fixes #40693. Change-Id: I4eb570de13165cde342d5fb2ee3218945ddf4b52 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/248478 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
…s390x The optimization that replaces inline markers with pre-existing instructions assumes that 'Prog' values produced by the compiler are still reachable after the assembler has run. This was not true on s390x where the assembler was removing NOP instructions from the linked list of 'Prog' values. This led to broken inlining data which in turn caused an infinite loop in the runtime traceback code. Fix this by stopping the s390x assembler backend removing NOP values. It does not make any difference to the output of the assembler because NOP instructions are 0 bytes long anyway. Note: compiler check omitted from backport to reduce risk of change. Fixes golang#40693. Change-Id: I4eb570de13165cde342d5fb2ee3218945ddf4b52 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/248478 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
@mundaym requested issue #40473 to be considered for backport to the next 1.15 minor release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: