Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

runtime: doc for Caller/Callers is backward wrt skip #3669

Closed
gopherbot opened this issue May 24, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

runtime: doc for Caller/Callers is backward wrt skip #3669

gopherbot opened this issue May 24, 2012 · 2 comments
Labels
FrozenDueToAge

Comments

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

by soniakeys:

Should CL 5976064 have been done on Callers instead of Caller?

> hg identify
67d925cf4352 tip

Example code:
http://play.golang.org/p/lvmuN5d4ZO
@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented May 24, 2012

Comment 1:

Owner changed to @robpike.

Status changed to Accepted.

@robpike
Copy link
Contributor

robpike commented May 24, 2012

Comment 2:

This issue was closed by revision 11c1b1f.

Status changed to Fixed.

robpike added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2015
@robpike
[release-branch.go1] runtime: fix docs for Caller and Callers

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
Verified
Learn about vigilant mode
f5ef888 
««« backport 443c7a2dabe9
runtime: fix docs for Caller and Callers
The previous attempt to explain this got it backwards (all the more reason to be
sad we couldn't make the two functions behave the same).

Fixes #3669.

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6249051

»»»
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2016
@rsc rsc unassigned robpike Jun 22, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
FrozenDueToAge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@rsc @robpike @gopherbot