Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cmd/go: 'go list -mod=readonly -e' should attribute errors to individual missing packages #34829

Closed
bcmills opened this issue Oct 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

cmd/go: 'go list -mod=readonly -e' should attribute errors to individual missing packages #34829

bcmills opened this issue Oct 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
FrozenDueToAge modules NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done.
Milestone
Go1.14

Comments

@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor

bcmills commented Oct 10, 2019 •
edited

This issue is pulled out from #29452 (comment).

I believe that go list -mod=readonly -e currently fails the entire command (and does not generate output for any package) if any package in the import graph cannot be resolved from a module already present in the go.mod file.

It should not: instead, it should report errors for the specific packages that could not be resolved from the existing dependencies.

CC @jayconrod
@bcmills bcmills added NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. modules labels Oct 10, 2019
@bcmills bcmills added this to the Go1.14 milestone Oct 10, 2019
This was referenced Oct 10, 2019
Closed
Closed
Closed
@gopherbot
Copy link

Change https://golang.org/cl/209037 mentions this issue: cmd/go: test that 'go list -e -mod=readonly' reports errors correctly

@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 4, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
FrozenDueToAge modules NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Go1.14
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bcmills @gopherbot