x/build: add builder for netbsd/arm64 #34036
Comments
bcmills
added
Testing
|
Change https://golang.org/cl/192997 mentions this issue: |
bcmills
removed
the
Soon
Those configurations currently lack builders, and it is not clear to me what state their tests are in. The Go porting policy¹ requires builders for all active ports, so let's not claim support until that requirement is met. ¹https://golang.org/wiki/PortingPolicy#requirements-for-a-new-port Updates #30824 Updates #31656 Updates #34035 Updates #34036 Change-Id: I6496de9d92fb8546048abf139cf10546a47e314b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192997 Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
|
Change https://golang.org/cl/192998 mentions this issue: |
…port on NetBSD and OpenBSD Those configurations currently lack builders, and it is not clear to me what state their tests are in. The Go porting policy¹ requires builders for all active ports, so let's not claim support until that requirement is met. ¹https://golang.org/wiki/PortingPolicy#requirements-for-a-new-port Updates #30824 Updates #31656 Updates #34035 Updates #34036 Change-Id: I6496de9d92fb8546048abf139cf10546a47e314b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192997 Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org> (cherry picked from commit 9f5127b) Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192998 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
|
Sorry that this was not clearer. We do not, as a matter of fact, have a netbsd/arm64 builder. The netbsd-arm-bsiegert is arm, as the name says. Right now, binaries compiled on netbsd/arm64 die when they receive a signal, so we cannot sensibly run the go tool on it. Rest assured that I'll take care of a builder when we are at that point. For now, removing arm64 from the release notes SGTM. |
|
Thanks for the confirmation! |
bcmills
changed the title
Those configurations currently lack builders, and it is not clear to me what state their tests are in. The Go porting policy¹ requires builders for all active ports, so let's not claim support until that requirement is met. ¹https://golang.org/wiki/PortingPolicy#requirements-for-a-new-port Updates golang#30824 Updates golang#31656 Updates golang#34035 Updates golang#34036 Change-Id: I6496de9d92fb8546048abf139cf10546a47e314b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192997 Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
While Go will build for these platforms, neither currently has a builder and netbsd/arm64 is apparently broken. It looks like the Go 1.13 release notes were updated to remove the announcement of these ports. Support for netbsd/arm64 is tracked in golang/go#34036 and support for openbsd/arm64 is tracked in golang/go#34035. Signed-off-by: Jacob Howard <jacob@havoc.io>
|
@bsiegert I saw your recent message on golang-dev. Let's use this as the tracking issue for the next steps. I can send you a builder key soon (on Monday). /cc @cagedmantis Issue #36841 may be relevant here. Please let us know if you think it would be viable to have a non-reverse builder for NetBSD ARM64. I think we can proceed with a reverse builder for now, but if a non-reserve builder becomes possible/easy in the future, let's evaluate that option too. |
|
I've provided a builder key to @bsiegert. Benny, please update this issue and/or ping me when you're ready to take the next steps here. |
|
@cagedmantis I am excited to hear about the non-reverse arm64 builder! There does not need to be any waiting involved; we can have both builders for the time being, and I'll happily decommission the reverse builder. @dmitshur provided a key, and I have the builder running right now. I will send a CL to add it to the coordinator. |
|
Change https://golang.org/cl/249137 mentions this issue: |
Update golang/go#34036 Change-Id: Ic92093e764fa163d97a2f125a4534581adf217da Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/build/+/249137 Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
@cagedmantis How is the non-reverse builder coming along? Anything I can do to help? |
The Go 1.13 release notes currently claim that “Go now supports NetBSD on arm64.”
We have a
host-netbsd-arm-bsiegertbuilder, but it isn't clear to me whether that is regular ARM or ARM64.By last report (#30824 (comment)), the
netbsd/arm64build may be broken.We should either get a
netbsd/arm64builder up and running and verify that it is passing, or remove the claim of support from the release notes.CC @bsiegert @bradfitz @ianlancetaylor @andybons @toothrot @dmitshur
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: