What version of Go are you using (go version)?

$ go version
go version go1.10.8 linux/amd64

Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?

yes

What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env)?

$ go env
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN="/home/zhoudazhuang/gobin/"
GOCACHE="/home/zhoudazhuang/.cache/go-build"
GOEXE=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="linux"
GOOS="linux"
GOPATH="/home/zhoudazhuang/db11/jm/pro"
GORACE=""
GOROOT="/home/zhoudazhuang/usr/local/go1.10.8/go"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/home/zhoudazhuang/usr/local/go1.10.8/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64"
GCCGO="gccgo"
CC="gcc"
CXX="g++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_CPPFLAGS=""
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/tmp/go-build040701016=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches"

What did you do?

tl, err := net.ListenTCP("tcp4", tcpAddr)
for {
		s := time.Now().UnixNano()
		conn, err := tl.AcceptTCP()
		e := time.Now().UnixNano()
		fmt.Printf("cost time: %s, %d \n",time.Now(), e-s)
		if err != nil {
			fmt.Printf("get err %s\n",err)
		}
		if conn != nil {
			go conn.Close()
		}
}

my linux is :

Linux ll-025048236-FWWG.AppPZFW.prod.bj1 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 10 17:27:01 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog && cat /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn
65535
65535
128G 30C

online env, I have probabily more than 100k tcp connection / each second, I have lots of close-wait conn. When I accept a conn, I do nothing,only call conn.Close then get Next conn by for. But my close-wait tcp conn more and more ,even more than few million close-wait.
I statistic by:

ss -s && ss -an | grep CLOSE-WAIT | grep 8082 | wc -l

or:

ss -s && ss -anp state close-wait 'sport = :8082' | wc -l

What did you expect to see?

I suspect it cause by conn.Close()
Is this the standard performance or something I can do?
I want to see there is no or few of close-wait tcp , or my linux will crash by memory .

What did you see instead?

even more than few million close-wait.