We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The s390x builder is unhappy since I enabled newescape by default; e.g.
https://build.golang.org/log/17d8a268ff942ee3fa4fa27ea8685aaa4347b689 https://build.golang.org/log/0e2023e3028d604edf2875a48664849fd1b0b53d
I'm expecting there's a s390x-specific runtime issue (like js/wasm's https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170323/).
I don't have access to an s390x machine at the moment, so trying to debug via looking at -m output from cross-compiling for GOARCH=s390x.
/cc @mundaym for FYI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looks like it's the same issue: https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/runtime/internal/atomic/atomic_s390x.go#L49
Sorry, something went wrong.
Change https://golang.org/cl/172417 mentions this issue: runtime/internal/atomic: fix s390x's StorepNoWB implementation
runtime/internal/atomic: fix s390x's StorepNoWB implementation
13b7c04
s390x
No branches or pull requests
The s390x builder is unhappy since I enabled newescape by default; e.g.
https://build.golang.org/log/17d8a268ff942ee3fa4fa27ea8685aaa4347b689
https://build.golang.org/log/0e2023e3028d604edf2875a48664849fd1b0b53d
I'm expecting there's a s390x-specific runtime issue (like js/wasm's https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170323/).
I don't have access to an s390x machine at the moment, so trying to debug via looking at -m output from cross-compiling for GOARCH=s390x.
/cc @mundaym for FYI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: