Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cmd/go: go build now builds executable under directory with same name as executable #31296

Closed
mark-rushakoff opened this issue Apr 6, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@mark-rushakoff
Copy link
Contributor

What version of Go are you using (go version)?

$ gotip version
go version devel +cf8cc7f63c Thu Apr 4 16:10:12 2019 +0000 darwin/amd64

Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?

No, it does not reproduce with go 1.12.2.

What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env)?

go env Output
$ go env
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOCACHE="/Users/mr/Library/Caches/go-build"
GOEXE=""
GOFLAGS=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="darwin"
GOOS="darwin"
GOPATH="/Users/mr/go"
GOPROXY=""
GORACE=""
GOROOT="/Users/mr/sdk/go1.12.2"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/Users/mr/sdk/go1.12.2/pkg/tool/darwin_amd64"
GCCGO="gccgo"
CC="clang"
CXX="clang++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
GOMOD=""
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_CPPFLAGS=""
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/var/folders/ct/bl4_z3g51ks8239_r2k07v_40000gn/T/go-build838756939=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common"

What did you do?

Given a layout with files like this, noting that there a main package inside cmd/foo and a top-level directory foo:

bash-3.2$ tree -F
.
├── cmd/
│   └── foo/
│       └── main.go
└── foo/

Then running go build ./cmd/foo now creates the binary to ./foo/foo whereas it was previously rejected:

bash-3.2$ GO111MODULE=off gotip build ./cmd/foo
bash-3.2$ tree -F
.
├── cmd/
│   └── foo/
│       └── main.go
└── foo/
    └── foo*

What did you expect to see?

I expected an error like the output in go.1.12.2 about the foo directory existing, and no binary being built:

bash-3.2$ $GOPATH/bin/go1.12.2 build ./cmd/foo
go build _/tmp/x/cmd/foo: build output "foo" already exists and is a directory

What did you see instead?

A successful build that placed an executable into ./foo/foo.

I haven't bisected, but I'm guessing https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167679/ (b48bda9) introduced this behavior, where:

  • I did not specify -o
  • The default behavior is equivalent to -o foo
  • foo exists and is a directory, therefore cmd/foo's resultant binary is placed inside the foo directory

In the actual project I'm working on, I occasionally run go build ./cmd/foo to ensure that foo builds correctly, and I expect no binary to be built because the foo directory exists. I was surprised that tip actually created ./foo/foo. I would run go build ./cmd/... to achieve the same thing but there are a lot of commands in this particular project, so go build ./cmd/foo is more to the point.

Reading the comments in the CL, looking at the tests introduced in the CL, and reading through the comments in #14295, it doesn't look like this behavior was intended.

@kardianos
Copy link
Contributor

I'll look into it.

@kardianos
Copy link
Contributor

I can confirm this behavior was introduced in that commit. I'll work on a fix.

@gopherbot
Copy link

Change https://golang.org/cl/171057 mentions this issue: cmd/go: do not write output when -o is not specified, but folder with same name exists

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants