Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brand book: hex color codes don't match RGB values #29695

Open
bcmills opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Brand book: hex color codes don't match RGB values #29695

bcmills opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
Documentation NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Milestone

Comments

@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor

bcmills commented Jan 11, 2019

I was writing a Playground link¹ for a quick reference to the Go brand colors, and discovered that some of the hex values for some of the colors in the Brand Book don't match the RGB values listed beneath them.

Specificially:

  • “Gopher Blue” is listed as #00ADD8,
    but its RGB value corresponds to #01ADD8.
  • “Light Blue” is listed as #5DC9E2,
    but its RGB value corresponds to #5EC9E3.
  • “Fuchsia” is listed as #CE3262,
    but its RGB value corresponds to #CE3062.

I'm not sure which of the values in those cases is correct, but they should be made consistent either way.

¹https://play.golang.org/p/DbqyvrenYA0

@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcmills commented Jan 11, 2019

CC @cnoellekb and @andybons, since this may also be relevant to the website revamp.

@dominikh
Copy link
Member

dominikh commented Jan 11, 2019

We've always been at war with Eastasia.

@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcmills commented Jan 11, 2019

@dominikh, thanks, I typo'd one. Fixed now.

@mdempsky
Copy link
Member

The CMYK values seem goofy too: https://play.golang.org/p/pGM0Wa56CAj

But I could be misunderstanding how CMYK works and mapping the brand book numbers into color.CYMK values incorrectly. I have trouble enough with 256-color terminals.

@rsc rsc unassigned spf13 Jun 23, 2022
@cagedmantis cagedmantis added the NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. label Jun 23, 2022
@cagedmantis cagedmantis added this to the Backlog milestone Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants