-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cmd/go: add support for Azure DevOps Git repos to go get #28236
Comments
Change https://golang.org/cl/142678 mentions this issue: |
@FiloSottile, it would be nice to say what the decision is when you add the NeedsDecision label. |
Note that GitHub generates the <meta> tags that the go command needs, so that GitHub-hosted code works with go get regardless of domain (e.g., GitHub Enterprise, although github.com has the tags too). At this point it would be nice if hosting sites like dev.azure.com would put the tags in and therefore own their meaning, instead of making the go project source code the source of truth. (That made sense early on when no one had heard of Go and not many sites cared.) |
thanks @rsc - meta tags on the Azure side is definitely another solution route, although due to the .../_git/... in the URLs, it would be more involved than MS just adding these to the existing address. Azure could, or I could, host vanity URLs with the meta tags pointing to the existing repo URLs but this is starting to get more involved and I'd really appreciate a simpler solution. |
Just adding the links to the issues on the Azure DevOps side:
to indicate that the mismatch between Azure DevOps and Go is a real problem for developers that have no choice but to use Azure DevOps, but want to champion Go. |
Will do. In this instance I'd like an owner of cmd/go to decide if we are still expanding the special case mappings, and if so what transformations should be applied to this one, as it seems to be the only one that magically adds a component to the path. For the record, I do believe adding |
@bketelsen perhaps you could add your experience, thanks. |
@rsc Whilst I think it would be a good idea for dev.azure.com to add tags, even if they did, I don't think that would solve the problem. As @MrWako says, because dev.azure.com repository paths have a .../_git/... in them go get results in folders that start with an underscore. One solution to this problem would be to "fix" the go tooling like go list so that it can handle folders that start with an underscore but it seems like an easier solution is to change go get. With the added benefit of getting cleaner import paths for dev.azure.com repositories. It might be a hard sell to convince MS to host vanity urls for dev.azure.com repositories because of the way go tooling handles folders that start with an underscore, although we are trying. |
To be clear I'm not suggesting having import paths with |
@FiloSottile I doubt MS will be able to serve pages at those exact urls as they might conflict with other pages, for example there already pages like https://dev.azure.com/markawakefield/GoGetTest/_workitems, https://dev.azure.com/markawakefield/GoGetTest/_build. |
If they all start with Anyway, I'm not the relevant owner, I was just suggesting that meta tags would be a solution that MS can control, deploy independently, and it would be backwards compatible instead of only working with Go 1.12 and with tools that didn't hardcode the existing set. |
What is the name space under (say) dev.azure.com/markawakefield/GoGetTest? What kinds of names can appear after the underscore? |
Unless Go users really want to see _git in their import paths, the fix here should really be on dev.azure.com's side. |
Hi @rsc names that can appear after the underscore are basically all the kinds that Azure has for its task tracking/development process, so things like _workitems (for you assigned workitems), _sprints (for sprint related views), _boards (for kanban-ish views), etc. |
Thanks all, this has been a healthy discussion, how do we try and get to a decision?
Coming to a decision is probably nearly as important than what the decision is so that I can make plans what to do next. Thanks, |
@rsc, @FiloSottile I think perhaps for historical reasons, they also serve pages (or redirect) if you put the name of a project team after the name of the project. For example: dev.azure.com/crsdrw/GoGetTest/BackendTeam/_git/app |
I'm a Program Manager for Azure DevOps. We've had this request several times over the past few years and I'd love if we could come to a solution for our Go users. While meta tags don't exist for Azure DevOps, adding those alone will not solve the problem. As others have noted, the crux of the issue is the presence of "_git" in the URLs. We use "_git" as a marker for routing, along with other markers like "_workitems", _dashboards", etc. Our Git URLs specify organization, project, and repo, but have also historically included team name with some of those components being optional (or omitted) if they are identical. Our Git URLs also require "_git" (except for SSH, but I believe that
@rsc There is a fixed set of names that can come after an underscore (e.g. _git, _workitems, _builds); project names cannot start with an underscore.
@FiloSottile Unfortunately, this won't work. This scheme matches https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/{team-name} and redirects to the dashboards directory page: https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/_dashboards/directory?teamId={team-name}. We've looked at other formats but we run into collisions without "_git". It sounds like the hesitation is around adding another special case mapping to cmd/go? Is there more information that I could provide that might make a decision on this easier? |
I'm not sure I understand. You're in control of the meta tags, can't you just not serve a tag at https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/_dashboards/...? If there is no way to map a space without underscores to the correct repositories, then doing the mapping in cmd/go won't help, and you need underscores in import paths, which will break many things we don't have control over. If there is a way to do such a mapping, you can do it by serving meta tags just as well as we can do it in cmd/go, and it will be more backwards compatible, better serving our shared users. |
Sorry but it's too late now for Go 1.12. Moving to the Go 1.13 queue and marking as a proposal. |
The original report and associated blog post note that one of the blockers to using |
It's not clear to me why there would be an issue with redirects: why can't the server either suppress the redirect when it sees the |
Right, I thought the PR was to add the meta tag to the Azure DevOps git page so .git wasn't needed. Maybe I misunderstood. Adding a go-import meta tag to AzDO should fix that. |
Unfortunately private repos will always require some auth workaround since we weren't able to intercept the page before the redirect. |
I see, thanks for the additional information! |
No problem. We want to work on getting "_git" out of the url and merging the original PR for this issue to remove ".git" as well, but those are coming in behind some other higher priority items on the backlog. Eventually we hope to have parity with existing vanity url services. |
Can you please provide us estimated timeline when it will be fixed. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
If you get a
Its reading from sum.golang.org, which does not exist there obviously (it s private). Setting GOPRIVATE (https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-Module_configuration_for_non_public_modules) to |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, maybe probably off topic too, but if you are here due to authentification issues sync'ing with Azure DevOps repos with
with
where environment variables containing the username and PAT taken. This proved more reliable for us than switching to SSH for azure repos. |
Reopening due to resumed discussion in #41030. |
@brkerr Is there any update on the state of affairs here? I think if we can get some clarity on the reason as to why adding the For us the last remaining issue is having to specify |
👋 hey folks, I'm the product manager for Azure Repos server. I got clued into this thread because users are now reporting that our documentation for using Brandon added the meta tags back in 2019, and we still serve them. (He's moved on from the product team so I won't bug him here.) I'm hitting our Git protocol endpoint with <meta name="go-import"
content="dev.azure.com/mattc-demo/Test1/_git/playground git https://dev.azure.com/mattc-demo/Test1/_git/playground"> Does that look correct for a Git URL For private projects, you have to present auth before we'll serve any content other than a redirect, and I probably can't change that. It looks like there was an (abandoned) effort to support our URL formats here. Is anyone willing to resurrect that change and land it? Alternatively, or in addition, if someone can advise me on what we can fix in that doc, I'd also be happy to make the changes. Thanks! |
@vtbassmatt Thank you. For us, for private repos is not working. |
@bcmills So based on @vtbassmatt comment - it seems as though the reason why Go is not recognising private ADO repositories as git repos is that an auth redirect is presented before other content and therefore So it seems to me as though the two options are:
|
@artbegolli, @vtbassmatt: the Is that not happening, is the server serving the auth redirect (or failing to serve the |
Over here we are not using a proxy. We keep getting We tried all the solutions suggested in this thread with no luck. |
@JoseFMP, are you using credentials from a |
@bcmills I tried using In private repos I keep getting:
401 Gone ===> What is this supposed to mean? |
Silly question here. What's supposed to be in |
Solved now... needed to tell explicitly in It seems it was really only that. |
Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!
What version of Go are you using (
go version
)?go1.11 windows/amd64
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
yes
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (
go env
)?GOHOSTARCH=amd64
GOHOSTOS=windows
GOOS=windows
What did you do?
I created a few public Azure DevOps repos to illustrate the problems
Then when trying to get the package with the
main
function I get:I think because go get does not know its a Git repo, and there are no meta tags supplied to indicate that it is. If I try to just get one of the other packages with a
.git
extension I get:I think because the .git extension on the URL is not being passed to the git commands, and therefore it hits an authenticated endpoint.
What did you expect to see?
I expected (hoped) to see the packages add to the
GOPATH
under thedev.azure.com
directory.What did you see instead?
No files added to the
GOPATH
I appreciate that this is not a pure issue with the current Go tool chain, more a miss-match between the conventions of Go and Azure DevOps, and has been noted elsewhere including http://ppanyukov.github.io/2017/02/01/golang-with-vsts-repos.html. Please let me know if a proposal is more appropriate.
For other cloud providers (IBM/Apache/OpenStack) there is logic to accomodate these differences and for Azure DevOps its actually a little worse than just the go get issue as even if this command completed the package ends up under a _git directory and so will be ignored in some instances due to the underscore.
Until now we have used Glide for package management which has allowed us to work around the issue but we would now like to adopt versioned packages so the issue is becoming more pressing.
I'll open a PR with a small revision addressing the issue that can be discussed/reviewed.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: