You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@josharian requested issue #27143 to be considered for backport to the next 1.10 minor release.
Certainly seems to qualify for a backport.
Yeah. My hesitation was only that this appears to have existed for many releases, and the symptom is a spurious compiler error (not bad code generation). Nevertheless, I agree.
In the compiler frontend, walkinrange indiscriminately calls Int64()
on const CTINT nodes, even though Int64's return value is undefined
for anything over 2⁶³ (in practise, it'll return a negative number).
This causes the introduction of bad constants during rewrites of
unsigned expressions, which make the compiler reject valid Go
programs.
This change introduces a preliminary check that Int64() is safe to
call on the consts on hand. If it isn't, walkinrange exits without
doing any rewrite.
Fixes#27247
Change-Id: I2017073cae65468a521ff3262d4ea8ab0d7098d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130735
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 42cc4ca)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/131595
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
@josharian requested issue #27143 to be considered for backport to the next 1.10 minor release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: