Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

all: use buf.String() instead of string(buf.Bytes()) in tests #26737

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

all: use buf.String() instead of string(buf.Bytes()) in tests #26737

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

as
Copy link
Contributor

@as as commented Aug 1, 2018

No description provided.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Used by googlebot to label PRs as having a valid CLA. The text of this label should not change. label Aug 1, 2018
@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 5150:

Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1

Not lgtm sorry. This test is testing the result of Bytes, I don’t want it be reliant on the operation of String when debugging test failures. I think this test is fine as is.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 5065:

Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 5065:

Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 12446:

Uploaded patch set 3: New patch set was added with same tree, parent, and commit message as Patch Set 2.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 12446:

Uploaded patch set 5: New patch set was added with same tree, parent, and commit message as Patch Set 4.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@as as changed the title use buf.String() instead of string(buf.Bytes()) in tests all: use buf.String() instead of string(buf.Bytes()) in tests Aug 30, 2018
@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 12446:

Uploaded patch set 7: Commit message was updated.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 12446:

Uploaded patch set 8: New patch set was added with same tree, parent, and commit message as Patch Set 7.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 5065:

Patch Set 8:

(2 comments)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

This PR (HEAD: 9395ad8) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/127158 to see it.

Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the comments slash command (e.g. /comments off)
See the Wiki page for more info

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Gerrit User 5206:

Patch Set 9:

(2 comments)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/127158.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like this timed out.

@bradfitz bradfitz closed this May 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Used by googlebot to label PRs as having a valid CLA. The text of this label should not change.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants