Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cmd/gofix: typechecker should vet input #2491

Open
rsc opened this issue Nov 22, 2011 · 8 comments
Open

cmd/gofix: typechecker should vet input #2491

rsc opened this issue Nov 22, 2011 · 8 comments
Milestone

Comments

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Nov 22, 2011

in gofix:

Method entries require "func()".
Func entries require not having it.
both should be consistent, and the
type checker should panic when presented
with input it doesn't understand.
@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Dec 9, 2011

Comment 1:

Labels changed: added priority-later, removed priority-medium.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Dec 12, 2011

Comment 2:

Labels changed: added priority-go1.

@robpike
Copy link
Contributor

robpike commented Jan 13, 2012

Comment 3:

Owner changed to builder@golang.org.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Jan 24, 2012

Comment 4:

Labels changed: added priority-later, removed priority-go1.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Sep 12, 2012

Comment 5:

Labels changed: added go1.1maybe.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Sep 14, 2012

Comment 6:

Labels changed: added priority-someday, removed priority-later, go1.1maybe.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Dec 4, 2013

Comment 7:

Labels changed: added repo-main.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Mar 3, 2014

Comment 8:

Adding Release=None to all Priority=Someday bugs.

Labels changed: added release-none.

@rsc rsc added this to the Unplanned milestone Apr 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants