mime: should application/x-javascript be changed to application/javascript ? #23767
Labels
Comments
romainmenke
changed the title
application/x-javascript be changed to application/javascript ?
|
This is #7498, which is still open. There was a CL (https://codereview.appspot.com/73070043) but (from the old thread):
and then the discussion stalled and the change was not merged. |
|
I've moved the old thread into the 1.11 milestone and tentatively labelled as "NeedsDecision" to give it a chance to be looked at in the near future. I guess you can comment in the old thread if you have any insights on why this would be a needed (and safe) change, to keep all the discussion in one place. I suggest we close this as a dup of #7498. |
|
@ALTree Yes this can be closed as it is indeed a duplicate (search failed me, or overlooked it). Thank you for the fast response. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
go/src/mime/type.go
Line 65 in 829b64c
What did you do?
Serve javascript files with go. The application runs in a docker container based on golang:1-alpine
What did you expect to see?
Content-Type : application/javascriptWhat did you see instead?
Content-Type : application/x-javascriptIllustration did not fit in a playground : runnable example
relevant? rfc4329
As far as I can tell golang:1-alpine doesn't come with any registered mime types. This means that only the built in types are used for content type sniffing.
application/javascriptis not included in the built in types.Should
application/javascriptbe included and (separately) shouldapplication/x-javascriptbe removed?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: