Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

x/build: create mips32 soft-float builder #22966

Open
aclements opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

x/build: create mips32 soft-float builder #22966

aclements opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
Builders x/build issues (builders, bots, dashboards) NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. new-builder
Milestone
Unreleased

Comments

@aclements
Copy link
Member

Commit 6be1c09 finished support for mips32 soft-float. We should have a builder configuration to test this.
@aclements aclements added this to the Unreleased milestone Dec 1, 2017
@gopherbot gopherbot added the Builders x/build issues (builders, bots, dashboards) label Dec 1, 2017
@aclements aclements mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2017
Closed
@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @dmitshur

@bradfitz bradfitz removed their assignment Oct 12, 2018
@bradfitz bradfitz added the NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. label Oct 12, 2018
@dmitshur
Copy link
Contributor

@bradfitz From x/build/dashboard/builders.go, it looks like all our current mips builders are reverse builders run by @MIPSbkirby, is that right?

Does that mean we'll either need to create the first direct builder of this type (and the accompanying environment for it) or ask @MIPSbkirby if he'd be willing to add this new configuration?

Are we interested in adding a full builder, or just a misc-compile one (compiles but doesn't run tests)? We do have a misc-compile-mips builder ourselves.

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

We don't need the cooperation of @MIPSbkirby.

We can reuse the host type and only add a new builder type with a different environment. And we can also restrict which tests it runs and just do some representative ones. (runtime, math, maybe time?)

@txthinking txthinking mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Builders x/build issues (builders, bots, dashboards) NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. new-builder
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Unreleased
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@bradfitz @dmitshur @aclements @ALTree @gopherbot