Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runtime/race: TestOutput flake on linux-amd64-race #19115

Closed
mdempsky opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

runtime/race: TestOutput flake on linux-amd64-race #19115

mdempsky opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@mdempsky
Copy link
Member

mdempsky commented Feb 15, 2017

runtime/race.TestOutput flaked on the linux-amd64-race trybot for golang.org/cl/37102: https://storage.googleapis.com/go-build-log/a6236839/linux-amd64-race_6bbdcdcb.log

I don't see any similar issues previously reported.

--- FAIL: TestOutput (25.32s)
	output_test.go:66: failed test case external_cgo_thread, expect:
		==================
		WARNING: DATA RACE
		Read at 0x[0-9,a-f]+ by main goroutine:
		  main\.main\(\)
		      .*/main\.go:34 \+0x[0-9,a-f]+
		
		Previous write at 0x[0-9,a-f]+ by goroutine [0-9]:
		  main\.goCallback\(\)
		      .*/main\.go:27 \+0x[0-9,a-f]+
		  main._cgoexpwrap_[0-9a-z]+_goCallback\(\)
		      .*/_cgo_gotypes\.go:[0-9]+ \+0x[0-9,a-f]+
		
		Goroutine [0-9] \(running\) created at:
		  runtime\.newextram\(\)
		      .*/runtime/proc.go:[0-9]+ \+0x[0-9,a-f]+
		==================
		got:

NoRaceAtomicAddInt64                     .
RaceAtomicAddInt64                       .
NoRaceAtomicAddInt32                     .
[...]
NoRaceWaitGroupReuse2                    .
RaceWaitGroupReuse                       .
NoRaceWaitGroupConcurrentAdd             .

Passed 347 of 347 tests (100.00%, 0+, 0-)
0 expected failures (0 has not fail)
FAIL
FAIL	runtime/race	62.794s

/cc @dvyukov

@dvyukov
Copy link
Member

dvyukov commented Mar 18, 2017

dup of #14119

@dvyukov dvyukov closed this as completed Mar 18, 2017
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants