New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x/crypto/poly1305: Sum declared in both sum_ref.go:37 and sum_arm.go for Go 1.6 #17512
Labels
Milestone
Comments
@agl, this only affects Go 1.6. The +build constraints aren't quite right. I'm tagging this Go1.8 because it needs to be done soon (red builders aren't useful to anybody), but it's not actually part of the release. |
bradfitz
changed the title
Sum declared in both x/crypto/poly1305/sum_ref.go:37 and x/crypto/poly1305/sum_arm.go:16
x/crypto/poly1305: Sum declared in both sum_ref.go:37 and sum_arm.go for Go 1.6
Oct 19, 2016
CL https://golang.org/cl/31492 mentions this issue. |
c-expert-zigbee
pushed a commit
to c-expert-zigbee/crypto_go
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2022
5f31782 added build constraints to disable assembly for Go 1.6 but didn't add the needed tags to the ARM files. Also, it's not clear that was needed as the error given in golang/go#17424 only complains about the chacha20poly1305 package. This change reenables the assembly for Go 1.6 in the poly1305 package. Tested with 1.6.3 and 1.5.4. Fixes golang/go#17512. Change-Id: I81b41f8810437ea327b415542402cd8ff5c8a390 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31492 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
c-expert-zigbee
added a commit
to c-expert-zigbee/crypto_go
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2022
5f31782 added build constraints to disable assembly for Go 1.6 but didn't add the needed tags to the ARM files. Also, it's not clear that was needed as the error given in golang/go#17424 only complains about the chacha20poly1305 package. This change reenables the assembly for Go 1.6 in the poly1305 package. Tested with 1.6.3 and 1.5.4. Fixes golang/go#17512. Change-Id: I81b41f8810437ea327b415542402cd8ff5c8a390 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31492 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
LewiGoddard
pushed a commit
to LewiGoddard/crypto
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2023
a3505e7 added build constraints to disable assembly for Go 1.6 but didn't add the needed tags to the ARM files. Also, it's not clear that was needed as the error given in golang/go#17424 only complains about the chacha20poly1305 package. This change reenables the assembly for Go 1.6 in the poly1305 package. Tested with 1.6.3 and 1.5.4. Fixes golang/go#17512. Change-Id: I81b41f8810437ea327b415542402cd8ff5c8a390 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31492 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
BiiChris
pushed a commit
to BiiChris/crypto
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2023
5f31782 added build constraints to disable assembly for Go 1.6 but didn't add the needed tags to the ARM files. Also, it's not clear that was needed as the error given in golang/go#17424 only complains about the chacha20poly1305 package. This change reenables the assembly for Go 1.6 in the poly1305 package. Tested with 1.6.3 and 1.5.4. Fixes golang/go#17512. Change-Id: I81b41f8810437ea327b415542402cd8ff5c8a390 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31492 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
What version of Go are you using (
go version
)?1.6.2-0ubuntu5~16.04
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (
go env
)?Ubuntu 16.04, armhf
What did you do?
Tried to build/install https://github.com/Yawning/obfs4 on an ARMHF machine.
Happens only for 32-bit arm. Not arm64, amd64, i386.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: