The go routine should get the timer as argument, because otherwise there will be a race. But even with that fixed the channel fires every few test runs.

Aside: you do realize the iter package was a joke, right?

I'd change your example to use for i := 0; i < 1000; i++.

@ulikunitz, I think the code looks fine. The goroutine closure captures the new tr variable each iteration.

This bit of code:

tr := time.NewTimer(0)
tr.Stop()
// There may or may not be a value in the channel now. But definitely
// one should not be added after we receive it.
select {
        case <-tr.C:
        default:
}

does not guarantee that there isn't an in-flight value on tr.C, because Stop may not have stopped the timer before it fired, yet that doesn't mean that the channel was ready to receive when the select ran. So it's a race.

See extensive previous discussion on #11513 and https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-dev/c9UUfASVPoU.

In the latter thread, @rsc suggests doing

if !timer.Stop() {
  <-timer.C
}

I also previously filed #12721 to ask for an easier way to create a new, stopped timer.

Indeed, looks like a dup of #12721.

But let's keep this bug open as a documentation fix issue for Timer.Stop. An example might help too.

Yes, it is a race.

if !timer.Stop() {
  <-timer.C
}

Is not sufficient, as there's no way to tell if the fired event has already been received. Which in my use case it often has. This is necessary, as linked in the thread: http://play.golang.org/p/Ys9qqanqmU

The race appears to be in the function timerproc() in runtime/time.go. The mutex timers.lock is unlocked for calling the runtime timer function, which sends the time into the channel. Therefore timer.Stop can return before the time value is written to the channel.

Calling the runtime timer function with the mutex locked, ensures that timer.Stop cannot return before the channel is written too. I tested all.bash and also checked the test function from @anacrolix. I think this can be justified because there is no way for a user to set the runtime timer function. I even checked whether I can compile the time package outside of GOROOT; it didn't work.

On the other hand I can't see how

if !tr.Stop() {
    <-tr.C
}

should fail. At least on Linux AMD64 I was not able to trigger the modified test to fail, even after creating 1 million goroutines.

It appears there are two ways to address this issue:

A) Amend the documentation of time.Stop(), or
B) calling the runtime timer function with the timers.lock hold.

I prefer B because it fixes the Test above.

@bradfitz You are right, there is no race in the test code.

I still don't think there's a race here. This is a documentation issue. See
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/c9UUfASVPoU/tlbK2BpFEwAJ for how to use Stop correctly.

See also #11513.

I should add: There is an argument for making

tr := time.NewTimer(0)
tr.Stop()
// There may or may not be a value in the channel now. But definitely
// one should not be added after we receive it.
select {
        case <-tr.C:
        default:
}

work, but it doesn't today, and we're certainly not going to do that for Go 1.7. Maybe early in Go 1.8 if someone wants to file a different bug.

CL https://golang.org/cl/23575 mentions this issue.

Just implemented a small fix, which can be used as a drop-in replacement.

https://github.com/desertbit/timer

@m4ng0squ4sh FWIW, in the revised docs (https://beta.golang.org/pkg/time/#Timer.Stop) please note the phrase "assuming the program has not received from t.C already". That wrapper package is actually impossible to use correctly if the program has received from t.C already: the receive in the wrapper's Stop method will block waiting for a value that isn't coming.

@rsc Thanks for pointing that out. That's why I included the following phrase:

This should not be done concurrent to other receives from the Timer's channel.

I'll add some more documentation so it's clear for everybody. It might be possible to even solve that problem by adding another channel and a Mutex to the wrapper. However I have to try that first. Are there any other solutions?

Note that most people would not consider:

t := time.NewTimer(1*time.Second)
<-t.C
t.Reset(2*time.Second)

to be calling t.Reset "concurrent to other receives". But the wrapper will hang in that case.

The obvious solution is to use time.Timer directly and not write a wrapper. I suppose you could kick off a new goroutine to pass time events along a new channel and keep track of whether any have been seen, but then you're creating a much more heavyweight timer, all to avoid one or two lines of code.

True story. Just have seen the updated doc (beta). Now it's clear. Thanks.
Yeah, firing up a new goroutine,... works. Just tried a small implementation but it's really too heavyweight.

Edit: Deleted the wrapper.

Finally, here is a lightweight drop-in replacement. This makes more sense for my projects, because sometimes it's just time consuming to fix the broken Reset behavior. Especially in a concurrent situation...

@rsc Would love to get some feedback and/or some hints, if everything is correct. Thanks!

@m4ng0squ4sh your Reset() is correct.
@rsc, there is really should be separate function in runtime to serve Timer.Reset() instead of calling stoptimer()+starttimer(), cause timer.lock should be captured once. Currently concurrently called Timer.Reset() could damage timers heap (this is not my finding).

@funny-falcon Thanks for having a look at it!

@m4ng0squ4sh I don't think the Reset is correct. If it were correct I don't think this program would panic:

package main

import (
	"time"

	"github.com/desertbit/timer"
)

func main() {
	for {
		print(".")
		c := make(chan int, 1)
		t := timer.AfterFunc(1*time.Millisecond, func() { c <- 1 })
		timer.AfterFunc(1*time.Millisecond, func() { t.Reset(100 * time.Second); close(c); t.Stop() })
		<-c
		<-c
	}
}

and if you fix that, be careful not to make this one hang:

package main

import (
	"time"

	"github.com/desertbit/timer"
)

func main() {
	done := make(chan bool)
	timer.AfterFunc(1*time.Second, func() {
		println("1")
		timer.AfterFunc(1*time.Second, func() {
			println("2")
			done <- true
		})
	})
	<-done
}

I don't think you can paper over this.

@rsc first, it panics with "time" package also.
It panics not because of some mistake, but because function passed to AfterFunc runs in separate goroutine. So, both AfterFunc's handlers are triggered simultaneously after 1 millisecond timeout: goroutines are spawned and scheduled for execution, - and it happens that second one runs before first one.
It is cause of design of AfterFunc in standard package: "user function should not affect internal timerproc, so that, goroutine is fired to run function". It was told me in https://codereview.appspot.com/12876047

@rsc AfterFunc was added to the package to stay compatible to the standard lib timer implementation. As mentioned in the doc:

AfterFunc waits for the duration to elapse and then calls f in its own goroutine.

So the panic must be expected.

Here is a simple ping example showing the general problem. I do believe that many gophers are not aware of the special Reset() conditions and that this is a common mistake.

package main

import "time"

const (
	keepaliveInterval = 2 * time.Millisecond
)

var (
	resetC = make(chan struct{}, 1)
)

func main() {
	go keepaliveLoop()

	// Sample routine triggering the reset.
	// Example: this could be due to incoming peer requests and
	// a keepalive check should be reset to the max keepalive timeout.
	for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
		time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
		resetKeepalive()
	}
}

func resetKeepalive() {
	// Don't block if there is already a reset request.
	select {
	case resetC <- struct{}{}:
	default:
	}
}

func keepaliveLoop() {
	t := time.NewTimer(keepaliveInterval)

	for {
		select {
		case <-resetC:
			time.Sleep(3 * time.Millisecond) // Simulate some reset work...
			t.Reset(keepaliveInterval)
		case <-t.C:
			ping()
			t.Reset(keepaliveInterval)
		}
	}
}

func ping() {
	panic("ping must not be called in this example")
}

@funny-falcon Yes, I know it panics with the Go time package. My point is that this package claims to provide a "fixed" Reset without these problems. It does not.

@rsc, it claims to fix Reset only for channel variant. There were no mention of AfterFunc before your comment.

Let's move this discussion off of a closed issue and onto golang-nuts. Thanks.