You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The commit adb1e03 leaves the issue on calculation of Pv6 common prefix length. It assumes that there's no prefix longer than 64-bit. Of course the assumption is wrong. We perhaps see that some network operators want to use /96 for IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The common prefix length function isn't exposed anywhere.
It's specifically there for RFC 6724 where I believe it functions as needed. Feel free to reopen if you have a concrete example of something that this breaks, or somehow that this violates the RFCs.
Just a reminder.
The commit adb1e03 leaves the issue on calculation of Pv6 common prefix length. It assumes that there's no prefix longer than 64-bit. Of course the assumption is wrong. We perhaps see that some network operators want to use /96 for IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: