Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cmd/go: go list ... with path checking is not vendor experiment-aware #12547

Closed
broady opened this issue Sep 8, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

cmd/go: go list ... with path checking is not vendor experiment-aware #12547

broady opened this issue Sep 8, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@broady
Copy link
Contributor

broady commented Sep 8, 2015

Test case:

$ export GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1
$ cat $GOPATH/src/a/vendor/b/pkg.go
package b // import "b"
$ go list ...
can't load package: package a/vendor/b: code in directory $GOPATH/src/a/vendor/b expects import "b"
@ianlancetaylor ianlancetaylor changed the title [cmd/go] go list ... with path checking is not vendor experiment-aware cmd/go: go list ... with path checking is not vendor experiment-aware Sep 9, 2015
@ianlancetaylor ianlancetaylor added this to the Go1.6 milestone Sep 9, 2015
@broady
Copy link
Contributor Author

broady commented Dec 9, 2015

Is this a dupe of #12278?

@ianlancetaylor
Copy link
Contributor

Perhaps, but at first glance I don't think so.

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Dec 17, 2015

I can't reproduce this with either Go 1.5 or current dev branch, using the directions given in the initial report.

Are you still seeing this problem? With the same test case?

Thanks.

@rsc rsc modified the milestones: Go1.6Maybe, Go1.6 Dec 17, 2015
@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Jan 6, 2016

Closing due to lack of response.

@rsc rsc closed this as completed Jan 6, 2016
@broady
Copy link
Contributor Author

broady commented Jan 11, 2016

Can't reproduce under 1.5.2, so either my initial report was wrong or it got fixed.

@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants