Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

encoding/json: incorrect handling of tagged anonymous fields #11408

Closed
mxk opened this issue Jun 25, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

encoding/json: incorrect handling of tagged anonymous fields #11408

mxk opened this issue Jun 25, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@mxk
Copy link

mxk commented Jun 25, 2015

go1.4.2 windows/amd64

https://play.golang.org/p/YGsBuS5Acz

The json package documentation says "an anonymous struct field with a name given in its JSON tag is treated as having that name, rather than being anonymous." I expected the same encoding of both structs in the example above. The same problem exists when unmarshaling values, which is how I bumped into this in the first place.

@ianlancetaylor ianlancetaylor added this to the Unplanned milestone Jul 11, 2015
@nodirt
Copy link
Contributor

nodirt commented Oct 14, 2015

This happens because time.Time implements json.Marshaler: https://godoc.org/time#Time.MarshalJSON

As a result, S1 "inherits" JSON marshalling of the embedded time.Time.

I assume you embed time.Time because you want to have all its methods in S1. An alternative to making time.Time a named field is to override MarshalJSON and UnmarshalJSON in S1:

func (s S1) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) {
  return json.Marshal(S2{s.Time, s.Value})
}

func (s S1) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {
  var s2 S2
  err := json.Unmarshal(data, &s2)
  s.Time = s2.Time
  s.Value = s2.Value
  return err
}

It works https://play.golang.org/p/FGjjXIdOWY

@minux
Copy link
Member

minux commented Oct 15, 2015

Working as intended.

@minux minux closed this as completed Oct 15, 2015
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 17, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants