Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

os: TestRemoveAllRace failing on Plan 9 #10911

Closed
0intro opened this issue May 19, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

os: TestRemoveAllRace failing on Plan 9 #10911

0intro opened this issue May 19, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@0intro
Copy link
Member

0intro commented May 19, 2015

Since May 13, the old school Plan 9 builder is intermittently failing on:

--- FAIL: TestRemoveAllRace (0.10s)
    os_test.go:1697: unexpected error: *os.PathError, "stat /tmp/issue008739954: stat buffer too short"
FAIL
FAIL    os  1.074s

http://build.golang.org/log/69b86932b8a019b1cddd72fcb23ebcaf34596803

I think the first failure appeared after changeset 6f2c0f1585e5 (CL 9964).

I've not been able to reproduce this issue when running the test manually.

@0intro 0intro self-assigned this May 19, 2015
@0intro 0intro added this to the Go1.5 milestone May 19, 2015
@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

If this is actually due to the malloc-in-signal-handler CL, why wouldn't we see the throw("malloc during signal") in the crash?

/cc @rsc

@0intro
Copy link
Member Author

0intro commented May 19, 2015

I don't think this issue is due to the malloc-in-signal-handler CL. It looks unrelated.
It's just that the first failure happened after this change.

This failure seems to happen every 2-7 builds, so it could be caused by an older change.

@gopherbot
Copy link

CL https://golang.org/cl/10900 mentions this issue.

@0intro 0intro closed this as completed in bd8e3d0 Jun 11, 2015
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 25, 2016
@rsc rsc unassigned 0intro Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants