code review 7577050: doc/go1.1.html: performance

doc/go1.1.html: performance
An overview is all that's required.

[r, 2013-03-22 23:55:51]

Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go

[remyoudompheng, 2013-03-23 00:11:16]

https://codereview.appspot.com/7577050/diff/1/doc/go1.1.html
File doc/go1.1.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/7577050/diff/1/doc/go1.1.html#newcode335
doc/go1.1.html:335: <li>The gc compilers now in-line some small functions,
including operations
inlining already existed in Go 1.0, so the new thing is inlining of what used to
be runtime calls (append, interface). Also functions with local variables used
to not be inlined. Maybe you just need to s/some small/some more small/

The performance benefits of the new func representation could be mentioned: for
example, funcs can be on stack.
Assembly routines are annotated for escape analysis.

Maybe also the fact that 8g can use the SSE2 FPU belongs here?

[r, 2013-03-23 00:14:58]

Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com, remyoudompheng@gmail.com (cc:
golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

Please take another look.

[bradfitz, 2013-03-23 00:22:50]

https://codereview.appspot.com/7577050/diff/8001/doc/go1.1.html
File doc/go1.1.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/7577050/diff/8001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode344
doc/go1.1.html:344: <li>The garbabe collector is also more precise, which costs
a small amount of
garbabe

[r, 2013-03-23 00:25:12]

If there wasn't so much modem noise in HTML it would be easier to find
the typos.

-rob

[adg1, 2013-03-23 15:07:32]

LGTM

[r, 2013-03-23 15:30:04]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=1405be4b6fc4 ***

doc/go1.1.html: performance
An overview is all that's required.

R=golang-dev, remyoudompheng, bradfitz, adg
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/7577050