code review 6848048: 2012/goforc: Slides for "Go for C programmers" talk.

2012/goforc: Slides for "Go for C programmers" talk.

[gri, 2012-11-16 01:45:39]

Hello r@golang.org (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go.talks

[r, 2012-11-16 19:11:03]

LGTM

[gri, 2012-11-16 19:53:19]

*** Submitted as
http://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=6f52cd2d3710&repo=talks ***

2012/goforc: Slides for "Go for C programmers" talk.

R=r
CC=golang-dev
http://codereview.appspot.com/6848048

[minux1, 2012-11-18 20:26:28]

http://codereview.appspot.com/6782087

https://codereview.appspot.com/6848048/diff/11021/2012/goforc.slide
File 2012/goforc.slide (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/6848048/diff/11021/2012/goforc.slide#newcode388
2012/goforc.slide:388: Support for multiple platforms: x86 (32/64bit), ARM
(32/64), Linux, BSD, OS X, ...
so we have plans for 64-bit ARMv8?

[gri, 2012-11-18 21:18:13]

That's a copy/paste error I think. But gcc has just gotten support for
ARM 64, I believe. Ian?
- gri

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:26 PM,  <minux.ma@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6782087
>
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/6848048/diff/11021/2012/goforc.slide
> File 2012/goforc.slide (right):
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/6848048/diff/11021/2012/goforc.slide#newcode388
> 2012/goforc.slide:388: Support for multiple platforms: x86 (32/64bit),
> ARM (32/64), Linux, BSD, OS X, ...
> so we have plans for 64-bit ARMv8?
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/6848048/

[iant2, 2012-11-19 03:03:44]

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> wrote:
> That's a copy/paste error I think. But gcc has just gotten support for
> ARM 64, I believe. Ian?

Yes, GCC 4.8, including gccgo, will support Aarch64 (ARM does not want
the processors to be called ARM32 and ARM64, although that does seem
to be the names that people tend to use).

Ian