code review 5572056: go.empty: prototype for new subrepository

go.empty: prototype for new subrepository

[rsc, 2012-01-24 20:28:39]

Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
default

[r, 2012-01-24 20:47:21]

http://codereview.appspot.com/5572056/diff/2001/README
File README (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5572056/diff/2001/README#newcode14
README:14: use the usual hg change, mail, submit to send in the change.
will someone need to set up codereview beyond having the .cfg file?

[rsc, 2012-01-24 20:51:52]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 15:47,  <r@golang.org> wrote:
> will someone need to set up codereview beyond having the .cfg file?

It depends on whether the [extensions] entry is in
their $HOME/.hgrc or their per-repository $GOROOT/.hg/hgrc.
In the former case, no; in the latter case, yes
(the same lines copy over).

Russ

[r, 2012-01-24 22:00:02]

by the way, LGTM but someone more code-social should probably agree

[rsc, 2012-01-25 19:45:15]

*** Submitted as b50a7fb49394 ***

go.empty: prototype for new subrepository

R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
http://codereview.appspot.com/5572056

[elibohr27, 2017-01-02 02:39:31]

On 2012super, /01/24 20:51:52, rsc wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 15:47,  <mailto:r@golang.org> wrote:
> > will someone need to set up codereview beyond having the .cfg file?
> 
> It depends on whether the [extensions] entry is in
> their $HOME/.hgrc or their per-repository $GOROOT/.hg/hgrc.
> In the former case, no; in the latter case, yes
> (the same lines copy over).
> 
> Russ

[elibohr27, 2017-01-02 02:53:45]

On 2012/01/24 22:00:02, r wrote:
> by the way, LGTM but someone more code-social should probably agree