LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go File src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go#newcode1 src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go:1: // Copyright 2013 The Go Authors. All rights ...
11 years, 2 months ago
(2014-01-08 10:38:34 UTC)
#9
On 2014/01/08 11:07:09, dfc wrote: > > > On 8 Jan 2014, at 21:38, mailto:jsing@google.com ...
11 years, 2 months ago
(2014-01-08 11:30:13 UTC)
#11
On 2014/01/08 11:07:09, dfc wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jan 2014, at 21:38, mailto:jsing@google.com wrote:
> >
> > LGTM
> >
> >
> >
> https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go
> > File src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go (right):
> >
> >
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.g...
> > src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go:1: // Copyright 2013 The Go Authors. All
> > rights reserved.
> > Copyright years are not updated - please revert this, given that the
> > file is predominantly a copy.
>
> Id like to disagree, this is a new file, even if 99% of it is a copy from
> someplace else.
It may be a new file, however it is a derivative work and as I understand it,
the original copyright year applies.
Sure. But I can cite many examples in the current code base that can support ...
11 years, 2 months ago
(2014-01-08 11:33:04 UTC)
#12
Sure. But I can cite many examples in the current code base that can support
*both* of our positions.
> On 8 Jan 2014, at 22:30, jsing@google.com wrote:
>
>> On 2014/01/08 11:07:09, dfc wrote:
>>
>> > On 8 Jan 2014, at 21:38, mailto:jsing@google.com wrote:
>> >
>> > LGTM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go
>> > File src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go (right):
>> >
>> >
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.g...
>> > src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go:1: // Copyright 2013 The Go Authors. All
>> > rights reserved.
>> > Copyright years are not updated - please revert this, given that the
>> > file is predominantly a copy.
>
>> Id like to disagree, this is a new file, even if 99% of it is a copy
> from
>> someplace else.
>
> It may be a new file, however it is a derivative work and as I
> understand it, the original copyright year applies.
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-codereviews" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to golang-codereviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go File src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/36020043/diff/340001/src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go#newcode1 src/pkg/os/stat_solaris.go:1: // Copyright 2013 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. ...
11 years, 2 months ago
(2014-01-09 15:09:16 UTC)
#13
Issue 36020043: code review 36020043: os, os/exec, os/user: add support for GOOS=solaris
Created 11 years, 4 months ago by aram
Modified 11 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
Base URL:
Comments: 3