code review 31780044: go.blog: add "Text normalization in Go" article

go.blog: add "Text normalization in Go" article

[adg, 2013-11-25 00:38:32]

Hello r, mpvl (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go.blog

[r, 2013-11-25 03:16:57]

LGTM

https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/normalization.article
File content/normalization.article (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/normalization.article#...
content/normalization.article:37: example, a superscript digit '⁹' and the
regular digit '9' are equivalent in
s/ a / the / or s/ the / a /

https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/normalization.article#...
content/normalization.article:101: Unicode character. In fact, there are no
restrictions of the number of
s/of/on/

[adg, 2013-11-25 03:22:43]

Will hold off submitting for a day or so, in case there are more comments.

https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/normalization.article
File content/normalization.article (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/normalization.article#...
content/normalization.article:37: example, a superscript digit '⁹' and the
regular digit '9' are equivalent in
On 2013/11/25 03:16:57, r wrote:
> s/ a / the / or s/ the / a /

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/normalization.article#...
content/normalization.article:101: Unicode character. In fact, there are no
restrictions of the number of
On 2013/11/25 03:16:57, r wrote:
> s/of/on/

Done.

[mpvl, 2013-11-25 08:37:44]

One small thing. The post mentions RemoveFunc, which is still pending
in 23220043. It would be nice if this could be reviewed first.


On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:22 AM, <adg@golang.org> wrote:

> Will hold off submitting for a day or so, in case there are more
> comments.
>
>
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/
> normalization.article
> File content/normalization.article (right):
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/
> normalization.article#newcode37
> content/normalization.article:37: example, a superscript digit '⁹' and
> the regular digit '9' are equivalent in
> On 2013/11/25 03:16:57, r wrote:
>
>> s/ a / the / or s/ the / a /
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/diff/1/content/
> normalization.article#newcode101
> content/normalization.article:101: Unicode character. In fact, there are
> no restrictions of the number of
> On 2013/11/25 03:16:57, r wrote:
>
>> s/of/on/
>>
>
> Done.
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044/
>

[adg, 2013-11-27 03:10:18]

*** Submitted as
https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=a1e3bbab8b86&repo=blog ***

go.blog: add "Text normalization in Go" article

R=r, mpvl
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/31780044