Hello This test still seems flaky somehow + go version go version devel +3f38e968e072 Wed ...
10 years, 6 months ago
(2013-10-10 14:36:25 UTC)
#4
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Hello
This test still seems flaky somehow
+ go version
go version devel +3f38e968e072 Wed Oct 09 13:52:29 2013 -0700 linux/amd64
+ go test -v -cpu 1,2,4 -timeout=60m std
--- FAIL: TestDialFailPDLeak (0.10 seconds)
dial_test.go:476: detected possible memory leak in runtime
On 2013/10/10 14:36:25, albert.strasheim wrote: > Hello > > This test still seems flaky somehow ...
10 years, 6 months ago
(2013-10-10 16:01:42 UTC)
#5
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2013/10/10 14:36:25, albert.strasheim wrote:
> Hello
>
> This test still seems flaky somehow
>
> + go version
> go version devel +3f38e968e072 Wed Oct 09 13:52:29 2013 -0700 linux/amd64
>
> + go test -v -cpu 1,2,4 -timeout=60m std
>
> --- FAIL: TestDialFailPDLeak (0.10 seconds)
> dial_test.go:476: detected possible memory leak in runtime
The lack of a number (not TestDialFailPDLeak-4) implies that the test failed
with GOMAXPROCS == 1. I have no explanation for that. I'm unable to repeat it.
How repeatable is it for you?
Ian
On 2013/10/10 16:01:42, iant wrote: > On 2013/10/10 14:36:25, albert.strasheim wrote: > > Hello > ...
10 years, 6 months ago
(2013-10-14 12:31:15 UTC)
#6
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2013/10/10 16:01:42, iant wrote:
> On 2013/10/10 14:36:25, albert.strasheim wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > This test still seems flaky somehow
> >
> > + go version
> > go version devel +3f38e968e072 Wed Oct 09 13:52:29 2013 -0700 linux/amd64
> >
> > + go test -v -cpu 1,2,4 -timeout=60m std
> >
> > --- FAIL: TestDialFailPDLeak (0.10 seconds)
> > dial_test.go:476: detected possible memory leak in runtime
>
> The lack of a number (not TestDialFailPDLeak-4) implies that the test failed
> with GOMAXPROCS == 1. I have no explanation for that. I'm unable to repeat
it.
> How repeatable is it for you?
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.042s
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.042s
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.042s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
--- FAIL: TestDialFailPDLeak-2 (0.02 seconds)
dial_test.go:476: detected possible memory leak in runtime
FAIL
FAIL net 0.029s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.031s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.038s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
--- FAIL: TestDialFailPDLeak-2 (0.02 seconds)
dial_test.go:476: detected possible memory leak in runtime
FAIL
FAIL net 0.029s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.031s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
ok net 0.031s
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test net -run=TestDialFailPDLeak
--- FAIL: TestDialFailPDLeak-2 (0.02 seconds)
dial_test.go:476: detected possible memory leak in runtime
FAIL
FAIL net 0.027s
go version devel +f1545db4a9c4 Mon Oct 14 00:18:46 2013 -0400 linux/amd64
Cheers
Albert
Issue 14526048: code review 14526048: net: fix TestDialFailPDLeak to work when GOMAXPROCS is large
(Closed)
Created 10 years, 6 months ago by iant
Modified 10 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers: albert.strasheim
Base URL:
Comments: 0