On 2013/09/24 15:05:40, rsc wrote: > Hello mailto:golang-dev@googlegroups.com, > > I'd like you to review ...
10 years, 6 months ago
(2013-09-24 16:50:08 UTC)
#3
On 2013/09/24 15:05:40, rsc wrote:
> Hello mailto:golang-dev@googlegroups.com,
>
> I'd like you to review this change to
> https://code.google.com/p/go/
Can't speak to the code, but the results LGTM.
I added a test explicitly running generalCAS64, so that we do not have to find ...
10 years, 6 months ago
(2013-09-24 17:23:30 UTC)
#5
I added a test explicitly running generalCAS64, so that we do not have to find a
machine configuration that actually falls back to that code in order to test it.
But I am not myself near an ARM machine. Can someone please try this CL? Any ARM
machine should do.
On 2013/09/24 17:23:30, rsc wrote: > I added a test explicitly running generalCAS64, so that ...
10 years, 6 months ago
(2013-09-24 18:13:06 UTC)
#6
On 2013/09/24 17:23:30, rsc wrote:
> I added a test explicitly running generalCAS64, so that we do not have to find
a
> machine configuration that actually falls back to that code in order to test
it.
> But I am not myself near an ARM machine. Can someone please try this CL? Any
ARM
> machine should do.
Good idea.
LGTM; all tests pass for me on ARM, including TestGeneralCAS64 and
TestCompareAndSwapUint64.
Issue 13859043: code review 13859043: sync/atomic: adjust for new runtime.cas64 prototype
(Closed)
Created 10 years, 6 months ago by rsc
Modified 10 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
Base URL:
Comments: 0