|
|
Descriptionmake.bat: return exit code to dashboard builder
Fixes issue 7806.
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : diff -r c0a68bcf19ae https://go.googlecode.com/hg/ #Patch Set 3 : diff -r c0a68bcf19ae https://go.googlecode.com/hg/ #Patch Set 4 : diff -r 4f11acb18404 https://go.googlecode.com/hg/ #MessagesTotal messages: 13
Hello golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com, I'd like you to review this change to https://go.googlecode.com/hg/
Sign in to reply to this message.
LGTM.
Sign in to reply to this message.
*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=67f9ef140028 *** make.bat: return exit code to dashboard builder Fixes issue 7806. LGTM=minux R=golang-codereviews, minux CC=golang-codereviews https://codereview.appspot.com/104690043
Sign in to reply to this message.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
This CL appears to have broken the netbsd-amd64-bsiegert builder. See http://build.golang.org/log/2756a7264b93dd6d5acbbe65ab6cb97ed8fe7631
Sign in to reply to this message.
False. # GOMAXPROCS=2 runtime -cpu=1,2,4 --- FAIL: TestFinalizerType-4 (6.84s) mfinal_test.go:61: finalizer for type func(*int) didn't run FAIL FAIL runtime 195.665s Build complete, duration 11m43.71612903s. Result: error: exit status 1 On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:30 PM, <gobot@golang.org> wrote: > This CL appears to have broken the netbsd-amd64-bsiegert builder. > See http://build.golang.org/log/2756a7264b93dd6d5acbbe65ab6cb97ed8fe7631 > > > https://codereview.appspot.com/104690043/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-codereviews" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-codereviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Sign in to reply to this message.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
It appears windows-amd64-race builder is broken since that change. The builder says ok, but it is false - I saw it said "ok" very quickly after I have submitted a CL (it could not run all tests that quickly). All subrepos are also broken. Alex
Sign in to reply to this message.
+Dmitry On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:34 AM, <alex.brainman@gmail.com> wrote: > It appears windows-amd64-race builder is broken since that change. The > builder says ok, but it is false - I saw it said "ok" very quickly after > I have submitted a CL (it could not run all tests that quickly). All > subrepos are also broken. > Right. It seems the race builder has some custom settings that are incompatible with the change.
Sign in to reply to this message.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2014/07/17 17:55:26, minux wrote: > > > Right. It seems the race builder has some custom settings that are > incompatible > with the change. I didn't investigate this properly, I am not sure about that. How do you know that "the race builder has some custom settings"? What are they? I will investigate this, but not sure when. Should I revert this change for now? Alex
Sign in to reply to this message.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:55 PM, <alex.brainman@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2014/07/17 17:55:26, minux wrote: > >> > >> Right. It seems the race builder has some custom settings that are >> incompatible >> with the change. >> > > I didn't investigate this properly, I am not sure about that. How do you > know that "the race builder has some custom settings"? What are they? > > I will investigate this, but not sure when. Should I revert this change > for now? > Have you tried to run race.bat on windows/amd64 host to see what happens? I believe the change is correct and shouldn't affect race.bat, so I'd like to know why before rollback. Dmitry, is windows-amd64-race builder just running race.bat or is it using some custom batch script?
Sign in to reply to this message.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2014/07/18 06:44:10, minux wrote: > > > Have you tried to run race.bat on windows/amd64 host to see what happens? I thought I did test ait properly, but obviously not. I will test some more. > I believe the change is correct and shouldn't affect race.bat, so I'd like > to know > why before rollback. Lets leave it for now - we have enough working builders for now. I will try to understand why it could fail. Alex
Sign in to reply to this message.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, minux <minux@golang.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:55 PM, <alex.brainman@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 2014/07/17 17:55:26, minux wrote: >>> >>> > >>> Right. It seems the race builder has some custom settings that are >>> incompatible >>> with the change. >> >> >> I didn't investigate this properly, I am not sure about that. How do you >> know that "the race builder has some custom settings"? What are they? >> >> I will investigate this, but not sure when. Should I revert this change >> for now? > > Have you tried to run race.bat on windows/amd64 host to see what happens? > I believe the change is correct and shouldn't affect race.bat, so I'd like > to know > why before rollback. > > Dmitry, is windows-amd64-race builder just running race.bat or is it using > some > custom batch script? Yes, there was a custom script because race.bat was not working before this change. I've removed it, let's see what happens.
Sign in to reply to this message.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, minux <minux@golang.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:55 PM, <alex.brainman@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2014/07/17 17:55:26, minux wrote: > >>> Right. It seems the race builder has some custom settings that are > >>> incompatible > >>> with the change. > >> I didn't investigate this properly, I am not sure about that. How do you > >> know that "the race builder has some custom settings"? What are they? > >> > >> I will investigate this, but not sure when. Should I revert this change > >> for now? > > > > Have you tried to run race.bat on windows/amd64 host to see what happens? > > I believe the change is correct and shouldn't affect race.bat, so I'd > like > > to know > > why before rollback. > > > > Dmitry, is windows-amd64-race builder just running race.bat or is it > using > > some > > custom batch script? > > Yes, there was a custom script because race.bat was not working before > this change. > I've removed it, let's see what happens. > The builder still seems to be broken, but I don't understand how could that happen.
Sign in to reply to this message.
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Yes, I have made mistake. Here https://codereview.appspot.com/118020043/ is a fix. Alex
Sign in to reply to this message.
|