code review 102020045: doc/contrib.html: update links, mailing lists and link ...

doc/contrib.html: update links, mailing lists and link to 1.3 release note.

[minux, 2014-05-31 08:51:35]

Hello golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go

[r, 2014-06-01 15:17:22]

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html
File doc/contrib.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html#newcode75
doc/contrib.html:75: mailing list is for actual reviewing of the code changes
(CLs).</p>
Pretty sure we don't want people subscribing to golang-codereviews.

[adg, 2014-06-01 22:38:18]

LGTM

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html
File doc/contrib.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html#newcode75
doc/contrib.html:75: mailing list is for actual reviewing of the code changes
(CLs).</p>
On 2014/06/01 15:17:22, r wrote:
> Pretty sure we don't want people subscribing to golang-codereviews.

Why not? I am.

People like to watch the code reviews of open source projects.

[minux, 2014-06-01 23:07:43]

On 2014/06/01 22:38:18, adg wrote:
> On 2014/06/01 15:17:22, r wrote:
> > Pretty sure we don't want people subscribing to golang-codereviews.
> Why not? I am.
Yeah, I'm too.
Should we add a warning that it has higher volume than golang-dev?
> People like to watch the code reviews of open source projects.

I'm not sure about my description of the purpose of golang-dev though.
According to /doc/contribute.html, all design proposals should go to
golang-nuts because normally we want to hear users' opinions. I don't
want to contradict ourselves here.

[adg, 2014-06-02 00:22:22]

LGTM

Try this wording instead.

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html
File doc/contrib.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html#newcode73
doc/contrib.html:73: mailing list is for discussing design proposals for the Go
project.
s/design proposals for/code changes to/

[r, 2014-06-02 00:23:14]

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html
File doc/contrib.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045/diff/60001/doc/contrib.html#newcode56
doc/contrib.html:56: </p>
Let's make this easier to maintain. Fold all of them into this, and then we
don't have to update it again.

<h4 id="release notes"><a href="/doc/go1.1">Go 1.1 Release Notes</a></h4>
<p>
A list of significant changes in Go 1.1, with instructions for updating your
code where necessary.
Each point release includes a similar document appropriate for that release:
<a href="/doc/go1.2">Go 1.2</a>, <a href="/doc/go1.3">Go 1.3</a>, and so on.
</p>

[minux, 2014-06-02 00:53:12]

Hello golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com, r@golang.org, adg@golang.org (cc:
golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com),

Please take another look.

[minux, 2014-06-02 02:49:00]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=de014d3583bb ***

doc/contrib.html: update links, mailing lists and link to 1.3 release note.

LGTM=adg
R=golang-codereviews, r, adg
CC=golang-codereviews
https://codereview.appspot.com/102020045