code review 101980049: go.talks: add 2014/gocon-tokyo 90% perfect talk

go.talks: add 2014/gocon-tokyo 90% perfect talk

[bradfitz, 2014-06-02 03:34:09]

Hello adg@golang.org (cc: golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com),

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go.talks

[crawshaw, 2014-06-02 03:45:27]

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/30001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide
File 2014/gocon-tokyo.slide (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/30001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:76: - C++: little more fun than C++, but more complexity
Second C++ is C?

Do you really mean more fun? Or "faster for human"?

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/30001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:89: * But...
- least fun language is the glue between X and C.

[adg, 2014-06-03 00:17:04]

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide
File 2014/gocon-tokyo.slide (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:7: bradfitz@golang.com
.org

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:34: - all my life's data from everywhere,
capitalize the first letter of these points?

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:41: * Which language to write Camlistore in?
"Which language to use for Camlistore?"

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:51: - fun
capitals? here and elsewhere

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:77: - Java: tedious (verbose), slow start-up, easy to
hire for
s/hire for/find programmers/ ?

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:108: - Perlythonubyscript: events. no choice. Callback
hell.
Threads in python actually make some kind of sense for simple things, even if
it's slow as hell.

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:143: - No more threads! No more callbacks!
You could phrase this better. Go does use threads. The kicker is *lightweight*
threads and nice primitives for communicating between them.

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:145: - So easy to write servers
maybe include the canonical accept loop:

for {
  conn, err := listener.Accept()
  // check err
  go serve(conn)
}

"goroutine per request can scale"

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:161: - Typically a job for scripting languages: Node.js,
Python, Ruby, Perl, PHP, etc.
I'd put this bullet first
Maybe also mention that Go's http server is high performance. you don't need
nginx

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:166: - pure Go PNG, JPEG, GIF encoding & decoding in the
standard library
mention other image libraries and maybe where they are?

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:174: - slower, but safer
worth mentioning it's not been reviewed?
maybe mention the relative size of the implementations? (not sure myself, but a
good indicator of complexity)

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:184: - web handlers (typically scripting language)
the parenthetical seems out of place here. maybe some context in the delivery
that isn't recorded in the slides?

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:193: - http://www.godrone.io/en/latest/
.link http://www.godrone.io/

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:298: - runtime race detector helps too
"go test -race"

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:342: - 4 version of memcached: Perl, C, C++, Go
s/version/versions/

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/40001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:346: - Almost entirely fixed in Go 1.3's Contiguous
Stacks
"contiguous stacks" in quotes and lowercase ?

[bradfitz, 2014-06-03 02:43:49]

Hello adg@golang.org, crawshaw@golang.org (cc:
golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com),

Please take another look.

[bradfitz, 2014-06-03 02:45:30]

I think I've addressed (or read) all feedback. PTAL.



On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:43 AM, <bradfitz@golang.org> wrote:

> Hello adg@golang.org, crawshaw@golang.org (cc:
> golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com),
>
> Please take another look.
>
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/
>

[adg, 2014-06-03 03:24:02]

LGTM

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/50001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide
File 2014/gocon-tokyo.slide (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/50001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:2: 31 May 2014
Maybe add a subtitle above this line
"GoCon Tokyo"

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/50001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:13: * “60% of the time, it works every time....”
weird
you use different quotes here to the next title
i prefer the other "regular" quotes

[bradfitz, 2014-06-03 03:26:44]

*** Submitted as
https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=c636a8a8316f&repo=talks ***

go.talks: add 2014/gocon-tokyo 90% perfect talk

LGTM=adg
R=adg, crawshaw
CC=golang-codereviews
https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/30001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide
File 2014/gocon-tokyo.slide (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/30001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:76: - C++: little more fun than C++, but more complexity
On 2014/06/02 03:45:27, crawshaw wrote:
> Second C++ is C?

Yes, thanks.

> Do you really mean more fun? Or "faster for human"?

Yes, more fun == faster for human too.

https://codereview.appspot.com/101980049/diff/30001/2014/gocon-tokyo.slide#ne...
2014/gocon-tokyo.slide:89: * But...
On 2014/06/02 03:45:27, crawshaw wrote:
> - least fun language is the glue between X and C.

Indeed.